Philosophically, I am dialectical
materialist. I think that each of us is a single psychophysical organism, not
two conjoined entities, a body and a soul. However, the language of "body and
soul" makes some sense if it is understood that the "soul" must be mortal, not
immortal. If your "body" is your visible physical social appearance and role
whereas your "soul" is your consciousness, then "body" and "soul" can be
differently related. Consciousness may be completely identified with physical
satisfaction and enjoyment and/or with social appearance and role.
Alternatively, it may be completely detached from them.
People around us treat us as if we were
simply identical with the person (persona =mask) that is visible to them.
We are socially trained to accept this identification but can see things
differently. It is as if the soul has entered the world with a mission to stop
identifying with the body by becoming more conscious of the reality underlying
roles and appearances. My public persona can be a role that I play for
social purposes, but not what I think I am. I think that my consciousness has
grown organically with my body, not that it has entered this body from a
previous life or another realm. But it is as if it has come here to learn
non-attachment to the body in the sense of "body" suggested here. This
does not entail negation of the body. The Buddhist teaching of "no soul" entails
a middle way between asceticism, emphasising the "body", and hedonism,
emphasising the "soul".
As we meditate, we become dispassionate
observers of our past social interactions. We are no longer simply the person
who was in conflict with others but observers of the conflict who are more
likely to avoid unnecessary conflict in future.
No comments:
Post a Comment